9 Best Prop Firms in the USA in 2026

Discover the 9 best prop firms in the USA for 2026. AquaFunded reveals top-rated trading firms with competitive funding, low fees, and proven success rates for traders.

Skilled traders often face a common challenge: their personal capital limits their earning potential in the markets. Prop firms in the USA solve this problem by providing traders access to substantial trading capital without risking their own savings. A funded account represents the gateway to trading larger positions while keeping a significant share of the profits and building a career with professional backing.

These proprietary trading firms operate through evaluation processes that test traders' skills and risk management abilities. Once traders prove their competence, they gain access to capital that removes the typical barriers that keep talented individuals stuck in small positions. AquaFunded offers traders this opportunity through their funded trading program, providing the resources needed to focus on executing strategies rather than worrying about account size limitations.

Summary

  • Proprietary trading remains fully legal in the United States. The Volcker Rule restricted federally insured banks from speculative trading with depositor funds, not independent trading firms or funded account programs. Traditional prop firms in Chicago and New York continue operating without legal interference, with firms like Select Vantage Inc employing over 2,500 staff in 39 countries. Regulatory actions against specific retail firms focused on business practices such as misrepresentation and fund handling, not the prop trading model itself.
  • Federal oversight distinguishes between firms that trade their own capital and those that manage client investments. The SEC regulates securities and investment advice, while the CFTC oversees futures and options markets. Most prop firms avoid these registration requirements because they trade only proprietary funds and maintain contractual relationships with traders rather than fiduciary ones. Over 50% of prop firms restructured their operations due to regulatory changes, but the core evaluation and funding model remains legally sound when properly structured.
  • Choosing a reliable prop firm requires verifying regulatory compliance, payout reliability, and whether evaluation criteria are designed for trader success or revenue extraction. U.S. traders should confirm where a firm is incorporated, with whom they contract, and whether the firm maintains transparent ownership. Firms offering 75% to 90% profit splits dominate the market, with some reaching 100% through scaling programs. The difference between an 80% and 90% split equals $1,000 per payout on a $100,000 account, generating $10,000 in profit.
  • Challenge-based firms require traders to pass evaluations before receiving funding, with pass rates typically between 5% and 15%. This means most participants pay evaluation fees without ever receiving funding, and multiple failed attempts at $300 each can quickly accumulate to $900 or more before accessing live capital. Firms that offer refundable fees and lower profit targets reduce this financial barrier while maintaining evaluation integrity that filters for consistent profitability and risk management.
  • Instant funding firms provide immediate capital but impose stricter risk rules and tighter drawdown limits compared to challenge-based models. The tradeoff is speed versus flexibility. Traders confident in their consistency can bypass multi-phase evaluations and start earning profit splits from day one, while those who prefer more room for error benefit from challenge structures that reward discipline over time through phased evaluations and scaling potential.
  • AquaFunded's funded trading program addresses these challenges by offering refundable fees, profit targets as low as 2-10%, and 48-hour payout processing, reducing both the financial barrier and withdrawal uncertainty that plague many evaluation-based models.

Is Prop Trading Legal in the USA

Laptop displaying rising financial candlestick chart - Prop Firms in the USA

Proprietary trading is completely legal in the United States. The confusion stems from regulatory changes that restricted specific institutions, not the practice itself. Understanding what changed, and what didn't, matters if you're considering funded trading as a path forward.

🎯 Key Point: The Volcker Rule restricts banks from proprietary trading with their own capital, but it doesn't prohibit independent prop trading firms or funded trading programs. The panic around legality exploded after high-profile enforcement actions and widespread misunderstandings about financial reform. Traders saw headlines about shutdowns and incorrectly assumed the entire model was banned. That's not what happened. "The Volcker Rule prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading, but it does not apply to independent trading firms or evaluation programs." — Federal Reserve, 2020

⚠️ Warning: Many traders still believe prop trading is illegal due to misleading headlines and incomplete information about regulatory changes that only affected bank-owned trading desks.

What did the Volcker Rule actually target after 2008?

After the 2008 financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act introduced the Volcker Rule. This regulation prohibited federally insured banks from using depositor funds for speculative proprietary trading. The intent was clear: stop institutions that hold public savings from gambling with that money.

How does the Volcker Rule affect independent trading firms?

What the rule didn't do: ban independent trading firms, hedge funds, or individuals from trading their own capital or firm capital. If you're working with a private prop firm or trading a funded account, you're operating outside the scope of the Volcker Rule entirely. The restriction applies to banks with FDIC insurance, not to standalone trading operations.

Traditional proprietary trading firms in Chicago, New York, and other financial hubs continue to operate without legal interference. Firms like DRW Trading, Jump Trading, and Jane Street hire traders, deploy capital, and execute strategies daily. According to Forbes, Select Vantage Inc alone employs over 2,500 staff across 39 countries, demonstrating the scale and legitimacy of institutional prop trading. These firms exist within U.S. financial law and face no restrictions on their core business model.

Why Some Firms Faced Regulatory Action

The real confusion comes from enforcement actions against specific retail challenge-based firms, not the prop trading model itself. In 2023, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took action against My Forex Funds. The issue wasn't that proprietary trading was illegal. The problem centered on business practices: alleged misrepresentation, handling of customer funds, and discrepancies between simulated and real execution. Compliance matters. Transparency matters. When firms make misleading claims about funding, charge hidden fees, or fail to properly segregate funds, they invite scrutiny. That's about how a specific company operates, not about whether the concept of funded trading is lawful.

How do traditional brick-and-mortar prop firms operate?

Traditional brick-and-mortar firms with physical trading floors generally operate under clear regulatory oversight from the CFTC and SEC. They have compliance departments, established track records, and transparent registration. Traders joining these firms can verify legal status and regulatory adherence before committing.

What challenges do online prop firms present?

Online prop firms present a different landscape. Many operate in less-regulated spaces, which creates both opportunities and risks. Some online firms engage in practices that physical firms cannot: misleading marketing about guaranteed profits, hidden evaluation fees, or low pass rates designed to extract revenue from challenges rather than fund traders. Others set evaluation criteria so difficult that few traders qualify, profiting primarily from repeated attempts rather than successful partnerships.

What's the real difference between legitimate and questionable firms?

The difference isn't about legality. It's about transparency and intent. Legitimate online firms provide clear rules, refundable fees, and genuine funding. Firms that obscure terms, delay payouts, or design evaluations to fail are exploiting the lack of oversight, not operating within a fundamentally illegal framework. Most traders want to know: Can I trust this firm? Will they actually fund my account if I pass? Will they pay me when I profit? Those questions matter more than whether the model itself is legal. The model is legal. The execution varies wildly. But knowing that prop trading is legal doesn't tell you which firms operate with integrity and which ones don't.

Related Reading

Laws and Regulations About Prop Trading in the USA

Trading setup with three stock monitors - Prop Firms in the USA

Prop firms in the United States operate legally when structured as service providers offering evaluation programs and access to funding, not as investment managers handling client capital. The regulatory framework distinguishes between firms that trade their own money and those that accept customer funds for investment purposes. That distinction determines which agencies have jurisdiction and what compliance obligations apply.

🎯 Key Point: The legal structure of prop firms hinges on whether they're trading proprietary capital or managing customer investments - this fundamental difference shapes their entire regulatory landscape.

"The regulatory framework distinguishes between firms trading their own money and those accepting customer funds for investment purposes." — This distinction is the cornerstone of prop trading legality in the US.

⚠️ Warning: Prop firms that blur the line between proprietary trading and customer fund management risk falling under stricter SEC regulations designed for investment advisors and broker-dealers.

Why is there confusion about prop trading legality?

The confusion around legality often stems from conflicting information about which rules apply to which firms. Traders see enforcement actions and assume all prop trading faces the same scrutiny. The truth is more nuanced. Federal and state regulations target specific activities, not the business model itself.

How does the SEC regulate prop trading firms?

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates firms that handle client securities, act as broker-dealers, or provide investment advice. Prop firms trading only their own capital typically avoid SEC broker-dealer registration because they don't accept or hold client funds for trading, execute trades on behalf of retail customers, or charge trading commissions. The relationship is contractual, not fiduciary. You're not investing with the firm. You're demonstrating skill in exchange for access to their capital.

What role does the CFTC play in futures trading oversight?

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) oversees futures, options, and swaps markets. According to TTT Markets, over 50% of prop firms have had to restructure their operations due to regulatory changes. Firms trading these instruments avoid CFTC registration when they trade only with proprietary funds, don't act as futures commission merchants, and don't solicit or accept futures orders from clients. The moment a firm accepts customer money for margin trades, it crosses into regulated territory.

Why don't most prop firms require FINRA membership?

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a self-regulatory organization overseeing broker-dealers. Most prop firms don't require FINRA membership because they maintain a clear separation between evaluation services and trading activities. They don't engage in broker-dealer functions or handle customer accounts in a manner that triggers membership requirements.

How do Blue Sky Laws affect prop firm operations?

Federal regulations provide the primary framework, but state laws add another layer. Blue Sky Laws, the colloquial term for state securities regulations, may impose registration requirements for certain financial activities. These vary by state. A firm operating nationally must navigate different compliance obligations depending on where traders reside.

What business registration requirements must firms meet?

Business registration requirements also differ. Some states require foreign entities to register before offering services to residents. Consumer protection laws create additional obligations. States like California and New York maintain aggressive enforcement against deceptive trade practices, which can extend to marketing claims made by online prop firms.

How can traders verify firm compliance status?

The challenge for traders: verifying whether a firm has met these obligations. Legitimate firms disclose their legal structure and registration status. Firms that avoid transparency about where they're incorporated, how they're regulated, or what legal entity traders contract with raise questions worth asking before committing funds.

What makes the prop firm model legal

The core distinction that allows prop firms to operate without triggering investment management regulations is simple: ownership and control of capital. All trading capital belongs to the firm, not traders. You're not pooling money with other participants. You're not receiving returns on invested capital. You're being compensated based on trading performance within parameters the firm sets.

How do contractual relationships support this structure

This structure is supported by clear contractual relationships. Evaluation fees are payments for a service: access to a trading challenge with the potential to earn a funded account. No guarantees of returns exist. No promises of investment profits. The terms of service explicitly define the legal relationship as performance-based, not investment-based.

What happens when firms blur these legal lines

When firms blur these lines, they invite regulatory scrutiny. If a firm markets itself as an investment opportunity, promises returns, or structures fees in ways that resemble pooled investment vehicles, it risks reclassification. The CFTC's action against My Forex Funds centered partly on whether the firm was operating as an unregistered commodity pool. The distinction between an evaluation service and an investment vehicle matters legally.

How does operational transparency provide legal protection?

Compliance isn't just about registration. It's about how firms conduct business day to day. Transparent documentation protects both the firm and the trader. Clear terms of service, refundable fee structures, and explicit profit-sharing agreements reduce ambiguity. When disputes arise, well-documented contracts provide legal clarity.

What happens when firms operate in regulatory gray areas?

Firms that obscure terms, change rules mid-evaluation, or delay payouts without explanation operate in a gray area that invites complaints and enforcement. State attorneys general and federal regulators respond to patterns of consumer harm. If enough traders report similar issues, a firm that technically operates within legal bounds may still face investigation for deceptive practices.

How can you distinguish between compliant and exploitative firms?

The difference between a legally compliant firm and one exploiting regulatory gaps often comes down to intent. Is the firm genuinely funding successful traders, or is it designed to extract evaluation fees with minimal payout? Legal structure matters, but operational integrity matters more. Platforms like funded trading programs address this by offering refundable fees, transparent profit targets, and guaranteed fast payouts, aligning their business model with trader success rather than revenue from evaluations.

What questions should traders ask before paying evaluation fees?

Before paying an evaluation fee, ask specific questions. Where is the firm incorporated? What legal entity will you contract with? Does the firm hold any regulatory licenses? How are funds segregated? What recourse exists if disputes arise? Legitimate firms answer these questions directly. They provide legal entity names, jurisdiction of incorporation, and clear explanations of their regulatory status. They don't hide behind vague language about "international operations" or "offshore structures" without explanation.

How can traders verify a prop firm's regulatory history?

Check whether the firm has faced enforcement actions. The CFTC and SEC publish enforcement releases. State securities regulators maintain databases of complaints and actions. A firm with a clean record isn't guaranteed to be trustworthy, but a firm with multiple complaints or enforcement actions carries obvious risk.

What contract terms should raise red flags for traders?

Read the terms of service completely. Look for clauses that allow the firm to change rules unilaterally, deny payouts for vague reasons, or impose fees not disclosed upfront. If the contract feels one-sided or includes language designed to limit your recourse, consider that a warning. But verifying legality only gets you halfway to the real question: which firms actually deliver on their promises?

How to Choose the Best Prop Firm in the USA

Traders analyzing multiple financial market screens - Prop Firms in the USA

Choosing the right prop firm requires evaluating regulatory compliance, payout reliability, and whether the firm's structure aligns with your trading style and goals. The difference between a firm that funds your growth and one that profits from your failures often comes down to transparency in the rules, the speed of withdrawals, and whether evaluation criteria are designed for trader success or for revenue extraction.

How do you verify a prop firm's marketing claims?

Most traders start by searching for "best prop firm" and end up overwhelmed by marketing claims. Every firm promises high profit splits, fast payouts, and flexible rules. The real work is verifying which ones deliver. That means looking past promotional language and examining the mechanics: how are funds handled, what triggers account violations, and how long do payouts actually take?

Understanding Prop Trading Regulations in the USA

Traders in the United States face a regulatory environment that shapes how prop firms operate and the protections they offer. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees stock trading activities, while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates futures and options markets. These agencies don't directly license most online prop firms, but they enforce rules around how firms handle funds, make claims, and structure relationships with traders.

What licensing requirements do prop traders face?

If a firm offers stock trading, it may require traders to hold a Series 57 license, managed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). This license allows traders to execute proprietary trades for a firm, but it isn't necessary for forex, futures, or crypto prop firms that operate outside traditional securities markets. The distinction matters because it determines which regulatory framework applies and what oversight is in place.

Why do many prop firms operate offshore?

Many prop firms operate offshore to avoid U.S. licensing requirements and offer higher leverage, unrestricted market access, and flexible payout models. This setup isn't inherently problematic. Offshore incorporation allows firms to serve international traders and provide products that U.S. regulations restrict. The risk emerges when firms use offshore status to obscure ownership, avoid accountability, or structure terms that would violate consumer protection laws domestically. Before committing to any firm, verify its legal structure. Where is it incorporated? What entity will you contract with? Does it maintain transparent ownership? Legitimate firms disclose this information clearly. Firms that hide behind vague language about "international operations" without specifics create unnecessary risk.

What makes a prop firm truly USA-friendly?

Not all prop firms accommodate U.S. traders equally. Some impose restrictions based on state regulations, others limit market access due to compliance concerns, and a few design their programs specifically around U.S. trading hours and tax obligations. According to CBS News, over 20 companies tested in 2025 showed significant variation in how they serve U.S. traders, with differences in payout methods, tax reporting, and platform compatibility affecting usability.

Why do clear trading rules matter more than promises?

Clear trading rules matter more than promotional promises. A strong prop firm provides transparency on profit targets, drawdown limits, and risk restrictions without confusing or misleading conditions. If the rules feel intentionally vague or buried in dense legal language, that's a warning. You should understand exactly what triggers an account violation before you start trading, not after you've been disqualified.

How do payout options affect your actual earnings?

Reliable payout options determine whether you can actually access your earnings. U.S. traders should verify whether a firm supports bank transfers, ACH withdrawals, PayPal, or crypto payments. Some firms delay payouts by offering only limited withdrawal methods or imposing minimum thresholds, thereby extending the time between profit and payment. If a firm claims fast payouts but only processes withdrawals through a single obscure payment processor, that's friction designed to slow you down.

What tax implications should you expect from prop firms?

Tax implications vary depending on how a firm structures payments. Some firms issue 1099 forms for tax reporting, treating traders as independent contractors. Others require traders to manage tax obligations independently, which shifts the compliance burden entirely to you. Understanding this upfront prevents surprises during tax season and ensures you're prepared for reporting requirements. Use these criteria as a checklist when evaluating firms. The last thing you want is to pass a challenge, receive funding, and then discover the firm imposes withdrawal restrictions, changes rules retroactively, or disqualifies accounts based on terms you never agreed to.

What trading platforms do prop firms support?

Each prop firm varies in the types of assets it allows traders to trade. Some focus primarily on forex, while others provide access to stocks, futures, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. U.S. traders should ensure that a firm offers the markets they prefer and the platform they're most comfortable using. Some firms only allow trading through a proprietary system, which forces traders to learn new interfaces, adapt strategies, and navigate unfamiliar execution environments. Others provide access to MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, or TradingView, allowing traders to use tools they already know.

How do broker requirements affect trading costs?

If you've spent years refining strategies on a specific platform, switching to a new one introduces unnecessary friction and increases the likelihood of execution errors. On top of this, some prop firms require traders to use a specific broker, which may affect execution speed, spreads, and trading fees. These hidden costs eat into profits. A firm that advertises an 85% profit split but forces you to trade through a broker with wide spreads and slow fills effectively reduces your take-home earnings. Ask which broker the firm uses, what spreads they offer, and whether execution quality matches what you'd get trading independently.

Profit Split and Payout Structure

One of the biggest considerations when choosing a prop firm is how earnings are distributed. A higher profit split means traders keep more of their hard-earned profits, while payout frequency determines how quickly they can access funds.

What profit splits do prop firms typically offer?

Most prop firms offer profit splits between 75% and 90%, allowing traders to retain the majority of their earnings. Some firms start traders at a lower profit share and increase it over time based on performance. According to CBS News, DNA Funded offers up to 90% profit split, placing it among the highest-paying firms in the industry. The difference between an 80% and 90% split becomes significant as account size grows. On a $100,000 account generating $10,000 in profit, that 10% difference equals $1,000 per payout.

How reliable are prop firm payout processes?

The payout process also plays a crucial role in a firm's reliability. While some firms process withdrawals quickly, others have delays or require traders to meet additional conditions before they can withdraw funds. If a firm advertises fast payouts but consistently delays processing for weeks, that's a sign of cash flow problems or intentional friction designed to retain funds longer.

Instant Funding vs. Challenge-Based Firms

Prop firms generally fall into two categories: instant funding firms and challenge-based firms. Both models have advantages, and the best choice depends on a trader's experience level and risk tolerance.

How do instant funding firms work?

Instant funding firms provide immediate trading capital but often impose strict risk rules. They typically have higher upfront costs and lower leverage. The appeal is speed. You pay a fee, receive an account, and start trading immediately. The tradeoff is tighter drawdown limits and less room for error. If you violate risk rules, you lose the account and the upfront fee.

What makes challenge-based firms different?

Challenge-based firms require traders to pass an evaluation process to qualify for a funded account. They usually offer higher profit splits, better scaling potential, and more flexible risk rules. The evaluation acts as a filter, ensuring that traders who receive funding demonstrate consistent profitability and risk management. According to QuantCrawler, 5-15% of traders pass prop firm challenges, which means the majority of participants pay evaluation fees without ever receiving funding.

How do traders handle multiple challenge attempts?

Most traders handle this by attempting multiple challenges, hoping to pass eventually. As attempts accumulate and fees stack up, the cost of entry rises. If you've paid for three failed challenges at $300 each, you've spent $900 before ever accessing live capital. Platforms like funded trading programs address this by offering refundable fees and profit targets as low as 2-10%, reducing the financial barrier and increasing pass rates while maintaining evaluation integrity. Traders looking for long-term scalability and better earnings potential tend to prefer challenge-based models. Challenges set traders up for success by reinforcing best practices and filtering out impulsive or undisciplined approaches. Over the long term, traders who pass challenges tend to make more profit because the evaluation process builds habits that sustain profitability.

What unrealistic promises should traders avoid?

Not all prop firms operate with transparency. Traders should be cautious of U.S. firms that make unrealistic promises. Any firm that guarantees profits or offers instant funding with no evaluation may not be trustworthy. Trading involves risk. No legitimate firm can promise returns. Hidden fees are another warning sign. Some firms charge unexpected withdrawal fees, inactivity penalties, or forced resets that weren't disclosed upfront. If the terms of service include vague language about "administrative fees" or "processing costs" without clear dollar amounts, expect surprises later.

How can unclear trading rules be exploited?

Lack of transparency in trading rules creates ambiguity that firms can exploit. If a firm doesn't clearly define drawdown limits, prohibited trading strategies, or payout conditions, it may not be operating in good faith. Rules should be explicit. If you have to email support to clarify whether a strategy is allowed, the terms aren't clear enough.

What payout issues indicate problematic firms?

Delayed or restricted payouts are the most common complaint among traders. A history of delayed withdrawals or extra conditions for accessing profits is a red flag. Check Reddit, Trustpilot, or industry forums for honest reviews. If multiple traders report the same payout issues, that's a pattern, not an isolated incident. Choosing a firm with clear guidelines, transparent funding terms, and a solid track record of payouts is crucial to avoid unnecessary risks. But knowing what to look for only matters if you know which firms actually meet these standards.

Related Reading

9 Best Prop Firms in the USA in 2026

The firms that consistently fund U.S. traders and process payouts without delays share a few characteristics: transparent evaluation criteria, refundable fees, and payout structures that prove the firm makes money when traders succeed, not when they fail. The nine firms below meet those standards while offering different funding paths based on your trading style, risk tolerance, and capital goals.

💡 Tip: Look for prop firms that offer refundable evaluation fees - this indicates they're confident in their process and genuinely want you to succeed rather than just collect assessment costs.

"The best prop firms align their success with trader success through transparent payout structures and clear evaluation criteria that focus on consistent profitability over high-risk gains." — Trading Industry Analysis, 2024

🔑 Takeaway: The most reliable prop firms distinguish themselves through proven track records of funding traders and processing withdrawals efficiently, making your capital goals achievable through structured evaluation programs.

1. AquaFunded

AquaFunded

AquaFunded operates as a performance-based evaluation firm, offering both structured challenge programs and instant funding options for traders who want immediate access to simulated capital. The firm distinguishes itself through straightforward rule structures and a 48-hour payout policy that removes the ambiguity around withdrawal timelines. According to Phidias PropFirm, 48-hour payouts set a benchmark for speed in an industry where delays often signal cash flow problems.

What funding pathways does AquaFunded offer?

Account sizes scale up to $400,000, with profit splits reaching 100% through performance-based add-ons and scaling plans. The firm provides three funding pathways: a 1-step challenge for traders seeking faster qualification, a 2-step challenge for those who prefer phased evaluation, and an instant funding program that eliminates the assessment phase entirely. Each model uses clearly defined daily and overall drawdown limits, avoiding the hidden rule layering that disqualifies traders for violations they didn't know existed.

How does the instant funding option work?

The instant funding option appeals to experienced traders who want to bypass evaluation but still access structured capital. You pay a higher upfront fee, receive immediate trading access, and start earning profit splits from day one. The tradeoff is tighter risk parameters and less room for drawdown recovery. For traders confident in their consistency, this removes the friction of multi-phase challenges while maintaining the accountability of defined risk limits.

How does AquaFunded's scaling plan reward performance?

AquaFunded's scaling plan allows traders to grow their allocation progressively through verified performance. Each successful payout cycle and adherence to risk rules increases eligibility for larger accounts. The structure rewards discipline over time rather than forcing traders to pass multiple new challenges to access higher capital levels. News trading and strategy flexibility vary by account type, but the firm avoids blanket prohibitions that force traders to abandon profitable approaches.

2. FXIFY

FXIFY

FXIFY operates through FXIFY Markets Ltd, licensed in Labuan, Malaysia, with payment processing handled by a UK-registered entity. The firm's backing from FXPIG, a broker with decades of experience in the FX industry, provides the infrastructure stability that newer firms lack. The Texas Tribune reports that FXIFY offers a 90% profit split with add-ons, placing it among the highest-paying firms for U.S. traders.

What evaluation programs does FXIFY offer?

The firm offers five distinct programs: 1-phase, 2-phase, 3-phase, instant funding, and instant funding pro. Each program removes time limits on challenge completion, allowing traders to work through evaluations at their own pace. Challenge fees are 100% refundable with the first payout for the 1-, 2-, and 3-phase programs, reducing the financial risk of multiple evaluations. The first payout becomes available on demand after you close your first funded trade, eliminating the waiting period that other firms impose.

Which trading platforms and pricing options are available?

FXIFY offers multiple platforms: MT4, MT5, DXtrade, and TradingView. Traders can choose between RAW pricing with visible commissions or All-In pricing that embeds costs into spreads. The flexibility matters because different strategies perform better under different cost structures. Scalpers benefit from RAW spreads with low commissions, while swing traders may prefer All-In pricing that simplifies cost calculations.

How much capital allocation can traders access?

The maximum combined allocation can reach $800,000 if challenges are passed at different times. A trader could hold a $400,000 funded account, a $200,000 funded account, and smaller accounts simultaneously, provided each was passed independently. This structure rewards traders who demonstrate consistency across multiple evaluations rather than capping total capital access at a single account size.

What optional features enhance the trading experience?

Optional add-ons include increased leverage up to 50:1, an extra 15% profit split bringing the total to 90%, bi-weekly payouts for faster access to earnings, and a safety net feature that allows traders to withdraw remaining earnings after a drawdown breach. The safety net prevents the total loss of accumulated profits if a single trade violates risk limits, addressing one of the most frustrating aspects of prop firm evaluations: losing weeks of gains due to a single mistake.

3. OneFunded

OneFunded

OneFunded positions itself as "the prop firm that backs the One who's ready," emphasizing discipline and skill development over rushed evaluations. The firm supports trading across forex, cryptocurrencies, indices, and metals, with account sizes ranging from $2,000 to $200,000. The $400,000 maximum allocation across all active accounts allows traders to scale through multiple successful evaluations rather than being limited to a single large account.

What challenge options does OneFunded offer?

The firm offers three challenge types: 1-step, 2-step, and instant funding. Each program removes time limits, allowing traders to complete evaluations at their own pace without arbitrary deadlines that force rushed decisions. Challenge fees are 100% refundable with the first payout, reimbursed once the trader passes and becomes a OneFunded Trader. The refund structure reduces the cost barrier for traders who need multiple attempts to pass.

How flexible are OneFunded's trading rules and payouts?

OneFunded allows news trading, EAs, and weekend holding, removing common restrictions that force traders to exit positions before major announcements or hold through low-liquidity periods. Bi-weekly payouts with a weekly option available provide flexibility for traders who want faster access to earnings. The firm provides access to 58 forex pairs, 23 cryptocurrencies, indices, and metals through TradeLocker and cTrader platforms.

How does OneFunded's account scaling structure work?

The maximum balance of $200,000 across all active accounts means a trader could hold two $100,000 accounts or four $50,000 accounts simultaneously. This structure allows traders to diversify strategies across accounts, test different approaches with separate capital allocations, or scale gradually through smaller increments rather than jumping from one account size to a much larger one.

4. The 5%ers

The 5%ers

The 5%ers have operated since 2016, long enough to establish a track record that newer firms lack. The firm has processed over 1.3 million trading accounts and maintains an average payout time of just 16 hours, which demonstrates both operational capacity and financial stability. The longevity matters because it proves the firm survived market cycles, regulatory changes, and competitive pressure without disappearing or restructuring to avoid payout obligations.

What programs does The 5%ers offer?

The firm offers three programs: HyperGrowth (1-step), High Stakes (2-step), and Bootcamp (3-step). Each comes with unlimited time limits and the potential for up to 100% profit splits at higher funding levels. The 100% split becomes available as traders scale to larger accounts, which aligns the firm's revenue model with trader success rather than evaluation fees. If the firm made money only from challenges, it would have no incentive to fund traders in the long term. The 5%ers rewards traders for passing Step 1 with Hub credits or cash bonuses, which can offset the cost of future challenges or provide immediate compensation for reaching milestones. This structure acknowledges that passing the first phase demonstrates skill, even if the trader doesn't complete the full evaluation. It reduces the all-or-nothing pressure that makes other firms feel like they're in a binary outcome: you either pass completely or lose everything.

How does The 5%ers support trader development?

The firm provides free educational resources, including an academy, webinars, and trading tools, as well as an active Discord community and regular live events. The educational component signals that the firm benefits from trader development rather than trader failure. If the business model relied on failed challenges, there would be no reason to invest in education that increases pass rates. Traders can hold 1x a $5K account, 1x either a $10K or a $20K account, and 1x either a $60K or a $100K account simultaneously. Scaling is available up to $500,000 on the High Stakes program, and traders can ultimately scale to $4 million in funded capital through consistent performance. The scaling structure rewards long-term success rather than forcing traders to restart evaluations whenever they want to increase capital.

5. BrightFunded

BrightFunded

BrightFunded launched in 2023 from the Netherlands, with additional offices in Dubai and Warsaw. Despite being newer, the firm has built a reputation for transparent rules and fast payouts, with processing averaging just 8 hours. Over 10,000 active traders and $7M+ paid out demonstrate that the firm has moved beyond the startup phase into operational stability.

How does the Trade2Earn loyalty program work?

The Trade2Earn loyalty program rewards traders with tokens on every trade, wins and losses included, which can be redeemed for free challenges, higher profit splits, or reduced targets. The structure acknowledges that trading volume and activity create value for the firm even when individual trades lose. It shifts the incentive model from punishing losses to rewarding engagement, thereby reducing the psychological pressure that leads traders to overtrade or take excessive risks.

What evaluation process and profit splits are offered?

BrightFunded offers a streamlined 2-step evaluation process with unlimited time to complete. Profit splits start at 80%, upgrade to 90% with an add-on, or reach 100% through scaling. Weekly payouts are available as an optional add-on, which matters for traders who rely on consistent income rather than waiting for monthly or bi-weekly cycles. The firm provides MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade platforms, giving traders flexibility in execution environments.

How does unlimited scaling benefit traders?

Unlimited scaling with no cap allows traders to increase account size by 30% every four months based on performance. The absence of a maximum allocation means traders aren't forced to stop growing once they hit a ceiling. The scaling model rewards consistency over time rather than requiring traders to pass new challenges each time they want more capital.

What optional add-ons can traders customize?

Optional add-ons include a 90% profit split (+20% fee), weekly payouts (+25%), no minimum trading days (+15%), and 100% fee refund (+10%). The modular structure lets traders customize their evaluation based on priorities rather than accepting a one-size-fits-all model. A trader who values speed might pay for weekly payouts, while someone focused on maximizing profit share might prioritize the 90% split.

6. FTMO

FTMO

FTMO has operated since 2015, making it the longest-running firm on this list. Over $500 million has been paid out to traders worldwide, which provides verification that the firm's business model works at scale. The longevity and payout volume matter because they demonstrate the firm survived market conditions that eliminated competitors and maintained financial stability through multiple economic cycles.

How does FTMO's scaling plan work?

FTMO's scaling plan increases account size by 25% and bumps profit split from 80% to 90% after four months of funded trading, provided the trader earns at least 10% profit, receives at least two payouts, and maintains a positive account balance. The scaling structure rewards consistency over time rather than forcing traders to face new challenges each time they want to raise capital. The 90% profit split at scale aligns the firm's revenue with trader success rather than evaluation fees.

What account types does FTMO offer?

The firm offers three account types: Standard, Swing, and Aggressive. The Standard account provides up to 1:100 leverage with moderate targets but prohibits holding trades over weekends or through major news events once funded. The Swing account allows overnight holding, weekend positions, and news trading but reduces leverage to 1:30. The Aggressive account doubles targets (20% Challenge, 10% Verification) and loss limits (10% daily, 20% max), with maximum allocation capped at $200,000.

What platforms and support does FTMO provide?

FTMO provides four platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade. The firm offers a free trial so traders can practice before committing funds, which reduces the risk of paying for a challenge without understanding the platform or rules. Performance coaches are available to funded traders, which signals that the firm prioritizes trader development over trader failure. Challenge fees range from €155 for a $10,000 account to €1,080 for a $200,000 account. The fees are higher than those of many newer firms but are fully refundable with the first payout. FTMO runs regular promotions, currently celebrating their 10th anniversary with discounts on the $100K challenge. Payouts are processed in about 8 hours on average, which demonstrates operational efficiency and financial capacity.

7. RebelsFunding

RebelsFunding operates under RIFM, s.r.o. out of Bratislava in the Slovak Republic, focusing on simulated training accounts with in-house technology. The firm's proprietary RF-Trader platform runs directly in the browser with TradingView charts, eliminating the need to download or install third-party software. The platform includes built-in risk tools that track drawdown in real time, which helps traders avoid violations caused by lagging data or delayed updates.

What program tiers does RebelsFunding offer?

The firm offers multiple program tiers: Copper, Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Diamond. Each tier is designed for traders at different experience levels, with Copper and Bronze providing affordable entry points and Diamond offering live-style commissions and larger capital allocations. The tiered structure allows traders to start small and scale gradually rather than committing to high-cost challenges before proving consistency.

How does the fee refund structure work?

RebelsFunding offers up to a 200% fee refund on Copper and Bronze programs after meeting targets, allowing traders to earn back double their initial fee. Silver and Gold programs offer 100% fee refund with the first reward. Diamond programs refund 100% after completing the initial training level, then transition to the RCF account with live-style commissions. The refund structure reduces the financial barrier for traders who need multiple attempts or want to test the platform before committing to larger accounts.

What payment options and pricing are available?

Global payment support includes bank transfers, Wise, Rise, and major crypto options, accommodating traders in different regions and those who prefer decentralized payment methods. Swap-free trading is available on 32 pairs and metals, which matters for traders who hold positions overnight or follow religious principles that prohibit interest. Price range spans $20 to $890 across all programs, depending on account size and currency. Discount codes like "REBEL10" offer 10% off all programs, reducing the entry cost for new traders. Affordable pricing makes RebelsFunding accessible to traders who want to test prop firm evaluations without committing hundreds of dollars upfront.

8. City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium has operated since 2018 and focuses heavily on trader development rather than just selling challenges. The firm is based in Dubai, with a global client base and a strong emphasis on education, coaching, and long-term progression. The educational component includes CTI Academy, coaching sessions, and regular content that helps traders improve skills rather than just pass evaluations.

What funding routes does City Traders Imperium offer?

CTI offers three main funding routes: a 2-Step Challenge, a 1-Step Challenge, and two Instant Funding options (standard and pro). All programs use a balance-based drawdown model, meaning risk limits are calculated from the account balance rather than initial capital. This structure gives traders more room to recover from drawdowns without violating rules, which reduces the frustration of being disqualified after small losses.

How does the profit sharing and scaling work?

Profit-sharing structures can reach 100% through scaling and VIP tiers, aligning the firm's revenue with traders' success. Scaling plans target up to $4 million in total allocation, which provides long-term growth potential for traders who demonstrate consistent profitability. News trading, overnight holding, and weekend positions are allowed across programs, which removes common restrictions that force traders to exit positions before major announcements.

What are the payout options and fee structure?

CTI processes payouts via bank transfer or crypto from the internal CTI Wallet. The wallet system centralizes payout management and provides transparency around withdrawal status. The firm does not publish a single flat-fee table; its structure is tiered by account size, with lower fees for smaller accounts. Instant Funding options carry higher price points but eliminate the evaluation phase, allowing traders to start earning profit splits from day one.

9. Think Capital

Think Capital

ThinkCapital operates as a broker-backed prop firm powered by ThinkMarkets, which provides institutional-grade execution and infrastructure stability. The firm offers three evaluation paths: Lightning (1-step), Dual Step (2-step), and Nexus (3-step). All programs require a minimum of just three trading days per phase with no overall time limit, which reduces the pressure to overtrade or force setups to meet arbitrary activity requirements. Profit splits start at 80% and can reach 90% with scaling or add-ons. The scaling potential is up to $1,000,000 per trader, providing long-term growth for traders who demonstrate consistent profitability. The firm offers ThinkTrader, Platform 5 (MT5), and direct TradingView integration, giving traders flexibility in platform choice and execution environment.

What customization options does ThinkCapital offer?

Optional add-ons include EAs, news trading, weekly payouts, and a 90% profit split. The modular structure lets traders customize their evaluation based on priorities rather than accepting a one-size-fits-all model. A trader who relies on automated strategies might pay for EA access, while someone focused on maximizing profit share might prioritize the 90% split. Account sizes range from $5,000 to $200,000, with base pricing starting from $59 for a $5,000 account. Promotional pricing can drop to $39 for the smallest account size, which makes ThinkCapital one of the most affordable entry points for U.S. traders. Fee refunds are available upon passing, reducing the financial risk of multiple evaluations.

How does ThinkCapital address common trader challenges?

ThinkCapital is available to U.S. traders for all challenge types, which matters because some firms restrict U.S. access or impose additional conditions based on state regulations. The firm's backing by ThinkMarkets provides execution quality and financial stability that standalone prop firms often lack. Most traders handle firm selection by attempting multiple challenges, hoping to find one that fits their style. As attempts accumulate and fees stack up, the cost of entry rises without guaranteed results. Platforms like funded trading programs address this by offering refundable fees, profit targets as low as 2-10%, and 48-hour payouts, reducing the financial barrier and increasing pass rates while maintaining evaluation integrity. But choosing a firm only matters if you understand the legal structure behind how these firms operate and what protections exist when things go wrong.

Trade Prop Legally in the U.S. — Without Regulatory Grey Areas

Legality isn't the real question anymore. The question is whether the firm you choose operates with structural clarity or hides behind vague terms that protect it, not you. A compliant model starts with transparency: how funds are handled, what your contract actually says, and whether the firm's incentives align with paying you or collecting fees. Choosing a funding model built around clear evaluation frameworks protects you more than relying on a firm with offshore registration and opaque ownership to honor payouts. AquaFunded provides US traders with a straightforward evaluation structure. No misleading claims about broker status, no hidden regulatory ambiguity, and clearly defined trading rules. You're not depositing investment capital. You're participating in a structured performance-based evaluation model. That distinction matters in the US regulatory landscape, where firms that blur these lines invite scrutiny that can freeze accounts or delay withdrawals.

The firms that survive regulatory shifts are the ones that never needed to hide. Transparent profit-split agreements up to 100%, no time-limit pressure that forces reckless trading, accounts up to $400K, and 48-hour payout processing remove the ambiguity that creates risk. Over 42,000 traders have already earned more than $2.9 million in rewards through a clean, structured framework. If legality and stability matter to you as a US trader, start with a firm whose model is transparent from day one.

Related Reading

‍

February 21, 2026
Your Journey Starts Here
Make Waves In Trading
Join Our Discord Community

Want to trade with our Capital and get a 95% Profit Split?

Get startedHow it works